For the past two seasons, Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz have split all eight Grand Slams between them evenly, establishing a dominance that looks set to continue in 2026. It’s the clearest example of their dominance, a dominance that echoes the 2006-2007 period when Roger Federer won four and Rafael Nadal, two. However, recently it was Federer himself who raised questions about the Sinner-Alcaraz reign, questioning whether it was simply due to their superiority or a deliberate manipulation of court conditions.
Federer stated, “This benefits those who need to hit extraordinary winners to beat Sinner, because if the court is fast, they might only need a couple of well-timed shots to win. Tournament directors think: ‘I’d rather have Sinner and Alcaraz in the final, you know?’ In a way, it works for tennis,”.
Alexander Zverev is echoing Federer’s opinion, stirring the debate. After overcoming Valentine Royer in the Round of 64 at the Shanghai Masters, Zverev shared his concerns about tournament organizers’ bias toward Alcaraz and Sinner. Christian’s Court’s X post quickly gained traction: “I hate when [court speeds are] the same. And I know that the tournament directors are going towards that direction because obviously they want Jannik and Carlos to do well every tournament,”.
The World No. 3 continued, “We always had different surfaces, you couldn’t play the same tennis the same way on a grass court, hard court, and a clay court. Nowadays you can play almost the same way on every surface.”
However, Zverev’s comments come at a time where his last five Grand Slam exits have been at the hands of Sinner and Alcaraz, igniting online criticism. Even Sinner responded, saying, “Speed of the courts? Carlos and I don’t make the courts, it is not our decision… I just try to adapt, play the best I can and that’s it.”
Fans are calling Zverev out for what they see as excuses. One user blasted him, calling him a “loser” and accusing him of being “so desperate to be in the conversation with Carlos and Sinner,” insisting he’s “not even close” to their level. The sentiment was echoed across the board, as another fan quipped that the German “can’t handle the fact that he’ll forever be no match for those two.”
The ATP points gap highlights the difference – Sinner (World No. 2) and Zverev (World No. 3) are separated by 4,970 points, while Zverev and Giron (World No. 50) are 4,940 points apart.
Others point out that Sinner and Alcaraz flourish regardless of surface. They’ve won titles on multiple surfaces, with Sinner dominating hard courts and Alcaraz winning Roland Garros and Wimbledon. Their adaptability disproves Zverev’s claim about homogenized surfaces.
One user reminded Zverev of his 2024 Australian Open defeat by Sinner on a fast court. “He’s just laughable… should I remind him how Jannik completely destroyed him on a fast hard court at the beginning of the year?”
Some fans noticed Zverev’s stance aligns with Federer’s earlier comments. “He’s literally just parroting Federer,” one fan joked. In other words, Zverev might be borrowing from an old playbook, but it doesn’t land as convincingly today.
The harshest critique came from those who saw his frustration as a deflection from his own shortcomings. “What a loser. Carlos and Jannik beat him because he chokes, and he’ll never get to their level. But let’s blame it on the court,”. After all, his recent Slam finals—French Open 2024 and Australian Open 2025—ended in losses to Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik sinner respectively.
For many tennis fans, Alexander Zverev’s comments sounded less like an analysis and more like an attempt to explain his inability to reach the same elite tier as Alcaraz and Sinner. What are your thoughts on Alexander Zverev’s comments?